Save the GDA Breeding Department!

Those of you who live here in California, can I ask a favor? There’s a state assembly bill coming up for a hearing on April 24th (tomorrow!) that could — if it passes as written — have a destructive impact on Guide Dogs of America, and possibly other organizations like it. If you’re a puppy raiser, it might affect you as well.

We probably all agree on the importance of spaying and neutering pets so as to prevent unwanted litters, strays, abuse and abandonment. The California legislature may have the best of intentions, but Assembly Bill 1634 endangers Guide Dogs of America (the breeding department in particular) because it seeks to impose mandatory spaying and neutering of all pets four months of age who do not have a special “intact permit.”

This explanation comes from the GDA Breeding Manager:

It is extremely important that you email or fax your opposition before 4/24/07. The current bill DOES NOT make any provisions for our breeding stock. Aside from no provisions for our breeding stock there will be a $150.00 intact permit fee for all pups and dogs over four months old. Because Guide Dogs of America is the owner of these dogs we would be responsible for paying for these permits. Just for the breeding stock alone our yearly fees would be around $9,000, this does not include any of our unaltered pups. If an intact fee is not obtained there will be a $500.00 fine for each violation.

Because our breeding stock does not qualify for an intact permit this would put an end to our breeding program. At this time we have enough puppies in the program to hold the school over for about two years. After that, good luck finding quality pups.

Please send your opposition to all of these assembly members. Also, it might help to send a letter to our Governor to veto the bill if it should pass.

Here’s more opposition to this bill, which affects not only service dog organizations, but also members of The American Kennel Club.

I followed up with her when I found a revised version of the proposed bill that seemed to cover service dogs, and she replied:

The key words are “being trained or trained as a Guide Dog.” Our breeding dogs are not being trained or trained to be Guide Dogs therefore would not qualify for an intact permit. The most unfortunate point is the extremely high licensing fees the raisers would need to pay for all pups four months and older that are not sterilized. Four months is way too young to make any decisions in regards to a pup’s future in the Guide Dog program (i.e. breeding or a future Guide Dog). In most counties the licensing fee is around $100.00 a year for intact dogs. GDA has a kennel license but it does not cover dogs that do not live on the premises.

You can see the problem. I know this is last minute, but if you have a moment to craft an e-mail today (especially if you are affiliated with a service dog org) and CC all of the following folks, that would be fantastic:

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
State Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814

Assemblyman Mike Eng, Chair
Fax 916-319-2149

Assemblyman Bill Emmerson, Vice Chair
Fax 916-319-2163

Assemblywoman Karen Bass
Fax 916-319-2147

Assemblywoman Wilmer Amina Carter
Fax 916-319-2162

Assemblywoman Mary Hayashi
Fax 916-319-2118

Assemblyman Edward P. Hernandez
Fax 916-319-2157

Assemblywoman Shirley Horton
Fax 916-319-2178

Assemblyman Bill Maze
Fax 916-319-2134

Assemblyman Curren D. Price Jr.
Fax 916-319-2151

Assemblyman Alberto Torrico
Fax 916-319-2120

10 responses to “Save the GDA Breeding Department!

  1. I sent an email out to all of them on Friday. Everyone, if you send an email, you should include your address and phone number.

  2. I don’t think I’ve ever written to a politician for anything before, but I wrote about this!

  3. For you and the GDA–anything! sending the e-mails now…

  4. Yet another example of politicians acting before thinking about all the consequences. Plus it stinks of a cash grab.

  5. Thanks for your support, everyone! And Julia, yes…welcome to California….

  6. hey jenny – we had this on our blog too, but it never went up. look at this, i think they heard us:(3) The owner provides proof to thelocal jurisdiction or its authorized local animal control agency thatthe dog is being trained or is documented as having beenappropriately trained and meets the definition of guide dog,service dog, or signal dog, as set forth in subdivisions (d), (e),and (f) of Section 365.5 of the Penal Code. think that’s enough?M&A

  7. Thanks for addressing this for more people to see.Looks like we are in for a hard fight. 😦

  8. Wow, I’m shocked they would try to do that. Do the emails have to be from CA people?

  9. I’ve been reading up on this a bit and I think the intention is right, this will definitly cut the #’s of homeless pets. I just hope that they realize how this is impacting places like GDA and will amend the law a bit. Good luck and keep us posted!

  10. We wrote to every last one of them.

Leave a Reply to Amy Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s